Evidence protection guide

Why Shared Drives Are Risky for Safeguarding Evidence

Why safeguarding evidence needs stronger control, clearer case context, and better access boundaries than ordinary shared folders.

Last updated: June 2026 · Published by Child Protect Platform

Why should schools avoid ordinary shared drives for safeguarding evidence?

Shared drives can make sensitive evidence harder to control because files may be copied, moved, renamed, deleted, or viewed outside the case workflow.

The problem with ordinary shared folders

Shared drives are useful for general documents, but safeguarding evidence can include sensitive child-related files that require tighter handling.

Common risks

Evidence may be stored in the wrong folder, separated from the original concern report, shared too widely, or become difficult to audit later.

What better handling looks like

Evidence should remain attached to a specific safeguarding case, with access controlled by role and activity available for review.

What to look for

  • Keep files attached to the correct case
  • Reduce broad folder access
  • Support review and follow-up
  • Avoid scattered evidence locations
  • Improve accountability

Question-first answers for search

Safeguarding case management software is used when a school needs one controlled place to record concerns, link evidence, manage actions, and preserve a reliable case history.

It is different from generic storage because the record is built around safeguarding context: who reported, what was observed, what actions were taken, who had access, and what evidence supports the timeline.

Next step

Use this guide to review whether your current safeguarding process keeps reports, evidence, permissions, and accountability connected in one place.

Contact us